Monday, January 22, 2007

Hyper coordinate systems

We have parallel Earths that are different resonant field, when we learn to map these parallel Earths/Universes; I believe we will notice one of their differences is their being unparallel, maybe a better term for parallel Earths IS Unparallel Earths (like different radio stations) and also their difference is to what degree they are squeezed or stretched in order to navigate in hyperspace, we’d have the fundamental coordinate system plus the local system that could be squeezed due to gravity and motion, -- compared to the fundamental, - flexibility of the coordinate system thus becomes meaningful

First dimension coordinate:

Let us assume a unit of first linear space-time dimension looks like this:

Second dimension coordinate:

Now if one unit grows in 2 directions perpendicular,
One negative & one positive
(We will have 2 units in 2 directions each)

What would be a linear representation of two dimensions?(A square of area 2)

A number to represent the numeric value of that square would be radical 2 which is the measure of the diagonal of a unit square

First dimension coordinate Second dimension coordinate

In representing the second dimension coordinate like above,

we have a numeric change for the value of 1

From 1 ==========> to radical 2

And we have an angular change of 45 degrees

This allows working with the concepts of dimension 1.1, 1.2…1.F (in hexadecimal)

1 -------1.6 -----------1.B -------------2 -------

And the associated angles from 0 to 45
(May the reader determine that?)

Bellow is decimal values for squares of area 1 to 7

that could also be used to create a Riemann’s Metric Tensor Coordinate system

that is to say; according to Pythagorean Theorem we would have radical 2 as the diagonal of a unit square, and radical 3 would be diagonal of a cube, a three-dimensional unit of volume,

Thus radical 4 & radical 5 & radical 6 & radical 7 &….

are diagonals and ratios of higher dimensions,

radical 1 = 1

radical 2 = 1.41

radical 3 = 1.73

radical 4 = 2

radical 5 = 2.24

radical 6 = 2.45

radical 7 = 2.62

Using these numbers a new form of Hauy construction is recommended, of course our construction will have cubes of different sizes

The construction of polyhedra using identical building blocks.

The illustrations below show such constructions for the
rhombic dodecahedron and octahedron

Hauy Construction --

from Wolfram MathWorld

Now entering the third dimension in this manner we will come up with an octahedron

David Wilcock Says:

The distribution of superclusters in the Local Supercluster neighborhood presents such a remarkable periodicity [i.e. ordered pattern] that some kind of network must fit the observed large-scale structure. A three-dimension chessboard has been suggested. The existence of this network is really a challenge for currently-suggested theoretical models… In this case, however, the identification of real octahedra is so clear and the network is so noticeably well-defined that a direct inspection is straightforward. (E. Battaner and E. Florido, 1998)

In The Fractal Octahedron Network of the Large Scale Structure, Dr. Battaner suggests the geometry of the octahedral matrix is “fractal,” meaning it has “self-similarity at all levels.” Larger octahedra are made up of smaller octahedra, which are made up of even smaller octahedra, and so on, ad infinitum. This conforms to the ancient teaching of “As above, so below,” the idea that the Creator is reflected in all things.

Also pay attention that Octahedron has been main frame of Delta-T Antenna, that has been used for teleportation, that is 3 square frame antennas perpendicular,

That should represent how time-space is shaped

Besides this octahedron 3-dimensionalization of our coordinate systems, we can create our third dimension by

adding an XX' coordinate to our square

In this formation besides regular X, Y, Z coordinates

we have one more linear representation coordinate, the central vertical line:(note that both cubes below contains 8 cubes of unit volume and
edge of radical 2)

And if we hang the cube like our initial square, again we will have 4 linear representations, exept for this time the radical 2 would be on a horizonal axis

Back to Index page

Google groups:

Battle-Shift Armageddon

Vaheh Pitchikian